openwrt/target/linux/generic/backport-5.10/600-v5.12-net-extract-napi-...

89 lines
2.3 KiB
Diff

From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:34:08 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll()
This commit introduces a new function __napi_poll() which does the main
logic of the existing napi_poll() function, and will be called by other
functions in later commits.
This idea and implementation is done by Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> and
is proposed as part of the patch to move napi work to work_queue
context.
This commit by itself is a code restructure.
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6802,15 +6802,10 @@ void __netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netif_napi_del);
-static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+static int __napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, bool *repoll)
{
- void *have;
int work, weight;
- list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
-
- have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
-
weight = n->weight;
/* This NAPI_STATE_SCHED test is for avoiding a race
@@ -6830,7 +6825,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct
n->poll, work, weight);
if (likely(work < weight))
- goto out_unlock;
+ return work;
/* Drivers must not modify the NAPI state if they
* consume the entire weight. In such cases this code
@@ -6839,7 +6834,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct
*/
if (unlikely(napi_disable_pending(n))) {
napi_complete(n);
- goto out_unlock;
+ return work;
}
if (n->gro_bitmask) {
@@ -6857,12 +6852,29 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&n->poll_list))) {
pr_warn_once("%s: Budget exhausted after napi rescheduled\n",
n->dev ? n->dev->name : "backlog");
- goto out_unlock;
+ return work;
}
- list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, repoll);
+ *repoll = true;
+
+ return work;
+}
+
+static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+{
+ bool do_repoll = false;
+ void *have;
+ int work;
+
+ list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
+
+ have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
+
+ work = __napi_poll(n, &do_repoll);
+
+ if (do_repoll)
+ list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, repoll);
-out_unlock:
netpoll_poll_unlock(have);
return work;