openwrt/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.4/950-0779-clk-bcm-rpi-Use-CC...

135 lines
3.9 KiB
Diff

From cd72d75cfb216a7ef15ec8649e57b03b4fc48b62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 11:13:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clk: bcm: rpi: Use CCF boundaries instead of
rolling our own
The raspberrypi firmware clock driver has a min_rate / max_rate clamping by
storing the info it needs in a private structure.
However, the CCF already provides such a facility, so we can switch to it
to remove the boilerplate.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
@@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ struct raspberrypi_clk_data {
struct clk_hw hw;
unsigned id;
- unsigned long min_rate;
- unsigned long max_rate;
-
struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi;
};
@@ -177,13 +174,11 @@ static int raspberrypi_fw_pll_set_rate(s
static int raspberrypi_pll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
struct clk_rate_request *req)
{
- struct raspberrypi_clk_data *data =
- container_of(hw, struct raspberrypi_clk_data, hw);
u64 div, final_rate;
u32 ndiv, fdiv;
/* We can't use req->rate directly as it would overflow */
- final_rate = clamp(req->rate, data->min_rate, data->max_rate);
+ final_rate = clamp(req->rate, req->min_rate, req->max_rate);
div = (u64)final_rate << A2W_PLL_FRAC_BITS;
do_div(div, req->best_parent_rate);
@@ -254,16 +249,15 @@ static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_regist
dev_info(rpi->dev, "CPU frequency range: min %u, max %u\n",
min_rate, max_rate);
- data->min_rate = min_rate * RPI_FIRMWARE_PLLB_ARM_DIV_RATE;
- data->max_rate = max_rate * RPI_FIRMWARE_PLLB_ARM_DIV_RATE;
-
data->hw.init = &init;
ret = devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &data->hw);
- if (ret)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ if (!ret)
+ clk_hw_set_rate_range(&data->hw,
+ min_rate * RPI_FIRMWARE_PLLB_ARM_DIV_RATE,
+ max_rate * RPI_FIRMWARE_PLLB_ARM_DIV_RATE);
- return &data->hw;
+ return ret;
}
static struct clk_fixed_factor raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm = {
@@ -299,22 +293,22 @@ static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_regist
return &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw;
}
-static long raspberrypi_fw_dumb_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
- unsigned long rate,
- unsigned long *parent_rate)
+static int raspberrypi_fw_dumb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+ struct clk_rate_request *req)
{
/*
* The firmware will do the rounding but that isn't part of
* the interface with the firmware, so we just do our best
* here.
*/
- return rate;
+ req->rate = clamp(req->rate, req->min_rate, req->max_rate);
+ return 0;
}
static const struct clk_ops raspberrypi_firmware_clk_ops = {
.is_prepared = raspberrypi_fw_is_prepared,
.recalc_rate = raspberrypi_fw_get_rate,
- .round_rate = raspberrypi_fw_dumb_round_rate,
+ .determine_rate = raspberrypi_fw_dumb_determine_rate,
.set_rate = raspberrypi_fw_set_rate,
};
@@ -324,6 +318,7 @@ static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_clk_re
{
struct raspberrypi_clk_data *data;
struct clk_init_data init = {};
+ u32 min_rate, max_rate;
int ret;
if (id == RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID) {
@@ -351,10 +346,30 @@ static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_clk_re
data->hw.init = &init;
+ ret = raspberrypi_clock_property(rpi->firmware, data,
+ RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_MIN_CLOCK_RATE,
+ &min_rate);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to get %s min freq: %d\n",
+ init.name, ret);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ }
+
+ ret = raspberrypi_clock_property(rpi->firmware, data,
+ RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_MAX_CLOCK_RATE,
+ &max_rate);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to get %s max freq: %d\n",
+ init.name, ret);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ }
+
ret = devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &data->hw);
if (ret)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ clk_hw_set_rate_range(&data->hw, min_rate, max_rate);
+
return &data->hw;
}